'It's Kind of a Funny Story', Movie and Book Comparison

I recently read Ned Vizzini's 'It's Kind of a Funny Story'. I finished it a few days ago, but the original plan was to read the book as part of one of the challenges of Book-Tube-Athon. That challenge was to read a book and then watch the movie adaptation of it. Now that did not really go to plan and I didn't start the book until a week or so after the readathon challenge ended, but I was determined to stick to my TBR, even if it meant reading it a week or two after I planned. As mentioned on my YouTube channel, I accidentally acquired the book and film in July, (a present that was suppose to be for my sister and it turned out she had both of them already), I knew my sister really wanted to read the book and I knew it had good reviews, so I thought why not read it?! That and the topic matter really intrigued me, I wanted to see how the book would portray mental illness and how the character was affected by it.


So to start my comparison, I thought it best to include my review of the Vizzini's book first. Now when I include my review, it may not be very articulate and amazing. My grammar and spelling is often appalling in these reviews, mostly because I tend to finish the books at unearthly hours of the morning, I insist on reviewing them in case I forget anything. This review is my reaction straight after finishing the book and how it impacted me. I have taken this review from my goodreads account: BookNerd94

Review

On Goodreads  I gave this book 4 stars, however I found it hard to place as I had mixed feelings about the book. I read this book from the 24-26 July 2014.

3/4 stars, I enjoyed this book but found myself skim reading some bits and wanting something extra t0 the story. However mostly good bits about the book. Respects to Ned Vizzini who used his own knowledge to influence him in the writing of this book , also RIP, I was saddened and shocked to find out that despite everything, he died last year. 

Anyway the story.

From the very beginning I found myself weirdly reflected in the main characters thoughts and actions. No, not all of them. But some of them felt very familiar, for example the cycle system Craig talks about as a way of thinking when he is panicking or anxious. I can really relate to that, as a natural born panicker who escalates things constantly in their mind, I started to see some of my odd and more frustrating traits reflected back at me. Another thing I related to was the food issues, something I have never understood myself, but I have always had a bad relationship with food and some of the experiences of throwing up from being anxious was something I wasn't a stranger too. 

Vizzini from his own experience creates a character that thousands of people can relate to if going through or have gone through a similar thing. This books is helpful for people who have ever felt low and second guessed themselves. 

The ending although irritating in it's form and structure, made a clear point that I loved. Feeling low and depressed is not about being cured, it's about managing it. Everyone will have bad times but it's about managing and fighting against the urge to lay down and let it consume you. 

I wouldn't say this was my favourite book in the world and it didn't really make me emotional at all. But I fond this book to be simple and meaningful. It was a more realistic look at something that is now affecting a large proportion of young people and a helpful reminder that you can conquer your demons, because you are, in fact, the one in control. 

Weirdly I enjoyed the first half a bit more than the second, I know it picks up after about 200 pages but I felt the beginning was more poignant. Also I loved the relationship between Noelle and Craig, even though it was a bit of love at first sight, and I'm doubtful it will be a forever love despite loving happy endings. It just was a nice relationship between the two of them. 

In general I loved all the different characters they all really stood out to me. Even though I got confused with so many and who worked there and who didn't, once or twice, I still like the complexity and true nature of mental illness presented in the novel 

I am really glad I read this and look forward to watching the film this week, hoping to do do a review comparison of the two as even after only seeing the trailer, I can tell they are going to be two very different entities.

 So that was my review of the book, 4 days later I found some time to sit and watch the film, I would of like to watch it a bit sooner after reading the book but I felt giving me some distant from the book enabled me to enjoy the film without losing enjoyment because 'It's not exactly like the book' and still be able to give a comparison of the two. 

So my review! Lets start of with the first question. WARNING: Starts positive and then somehow turns really negative even though I did enjoy the movie and thought it was really good.

Did the film reflect the book well?

At first when the film started rolling I wanted to shout at the screen and say no, but that was two minutes in, before I had even given the film a chance! Granted I went into the film, after seeing the trailer, very hesitant that it would reflect the book well at all. But I think I deserve a slap at my attitude, especially so early on. The story starts of at the Brooklyn Bridge and thats when I got angry that the film didn't follow the book... but then it did... I felt like such an idiot. The beginning followed  the book just fine! Anyway as to the rest of the film, once I had relaxed on my brain having to think that the film wouldn't live up to the novel, I realised something. For a film this book worked really well, it stayed very close to the story line and the atomsphere of the novel came across really well on the screen. 

Was it a good movie?

As I thought to the book, the movie was okay. I don't think it was a film I loved, I know it won't be in my top 20 films of all time. But it was enjoyable all the same. I would give the film 3/4 stars, same as the book.

Casting Choices and Character Portrayal?

(I won't talk on all the characters but just the main few and not all our judgements on who played the character but how the characters were made to be seen too)

• Craig played by Keir Gilchrist: I have never seen anything before with Keir in, well not that I know of, so that made it hard to judge whether I enjoyed his acting as an actor overall. In this case however, I feel he made a good portrayal of the character of Craig. However, I felt that sometimes he appeared to happy for someone who had just been admitted to a mental hospital. (Don't hate on me, I just thought sometimes he had a lot more confidence than in the book)That may have been due to the script, but sometimes I felt he didn't portray the characters thought processes as well as is portrayed in the book. As appearance, I thought Keir worked well, he wasn't exactly how my mind envisioned him, but he was a close match.

• Noelle played by Emma Roberts: I have seen a lot of Emma Roberts work, and have really enjoyed it, most of them I saw in my young/mid teens, but I have enjoyed watching films with her in. Acting wise, I don't think she was bad, she took the role and made it work. There were sometimes when I found she was a bit more outgoing towards Craig when I found her to be a lot more shyer in the book. Also I found that the character wasn't explored enough and there is parts in the book where there is a lot more to her as a person. Appearance wise, I love Emma Roberts... but I don't think she fitted that well, Too hollywood. I think sometimes the characters are not portrayed enough as real people and Noelle looked a bit too much that way. The only other pet peeve was the scars on Noelles face, the story tells of a more mutilation and although the wounds are healing they still appear a bit rugged. The film makes them look most of the time very clean cut. 

• Bobby played by Zach Galifianakis: I have seen Zach in quite a few things, Hangover and Due Date. Both comedy roles. This role as Bobby was a lot more troubled and although not a comedy like Zach's other films, he still kept that twinkle that fitted with the almost ironic indie humour that was featured throughout. I liked Zach's acting and found it worked well in the film. The character of Bobby was made a lot more central to the storyline as well, which was interesting to watch in terms of the relationship between Bobby and Craig worked out. 

• Lynn played by Lauren Graham: Famous for Gilmore Girls, The Pacifier, Evan Almighty and much more and a very beautiful lady. I was intrigued to the casting of Lauren as Craig's mum, It seemed that there was lot of big stars caught to make this film. Not having a large role in the film, I felt it was hard to judge her character. But in the book Lynn's character was a little big bigger and I found on screen that the character didn't seem to connect with her child as much in the book and I imagined a lot more feeling and concern for her son. Sometimes the words she were saying didn't match up with her facial expressions. Although she worked well in the scene when Craig was younger.

• George played by Jim Gaffigan: Similar to Craigs' mum, I felt the emotion was missing. One of the scenes they missed out which I will talk about later, I felt was important to establish the relationship between father and son. I had nothing wrong with the actor in this case, it was more the script. I felt that that relationship wasn't very strong and the characters of the parents were very much eliminated from the movies as much as possible. 

Parts that where changed?

Okay, so for this I have just picked out a few things I can think of off the top of my head. I know there is more but I will add them in the future if they come to me.

Parents: so as I said previously,  the parents in the story became less important and were more small roles to the side than the larger roles they play in the book. This wasn't a completely bad thing but when the scenes did pop up, I felt that the parents were most of the time just stand ins. The sister worked well and felt more like a sibling, but the parents role sometimes felt pointless in the film. As mentioned above a scene from the book where Craig's dad brings over a film and stays to watch some of it with the patients is cut out. This I found quite sad as the film portrays Craig's dad as someone who is not really around due to work and only cares about his child's education, which if I'm not mistaken, I felt reading the book wasn't true. I felt that the father in the book was a lot more interval in his sons life and the scene they changed and cut out would have shown that a bit more.

Music Scene and 'Under Pressure': This scene I was unsure of, the very comical and almost tacky outfits and design took me for surprise in the context of the film. I am still not sure as to whether this worked. I am not very used to humour in these type of films and I found it hard to know whether it was funny or not. However, the signing of Under Pressure worked really well. A perfect song in terms of the reasons for why Craig was depressed. But... yes there is a but... I found that the film didn't portray the reasons as to why Craig was depressed very well. The film portrayed Craig as having very little reasons to his depression and although that can be the case, in the book it was mentioned heavily that some of the cause was pressure at his new school. Plus... SPOILER... the book talks of how he changes schools, the film doesn't give any indication of that. I know that the film has to create a focus however, so trying to focus on all the many small things would be difficult in a film.

Workings of brain: Yes, the one thing that made me really enjoy the book was the working of Craig's brain and how it was portrayed in the book as cycling and there was a lot more emphasis on what was going on up there. Yes, there was the narration over hear by Craig, but I felt sometimes if I hadn't read the book I would of found the film not as interesting. 

The way the past was weaved in:  The past was weaved in a little differently to the book, I actually think this worked well, particularly because the action in the novel does not start until about 200 pages in. It made sense to start where the books action began, even if it meant some of the memories and past that helped me understood Craig as a character a bit more had to be reduced or taken out.

Other Patients and focus on Bobby: Another thing I am torn whether it was done well was the way the other patients where hardly focused on in the film. There was introductions and small mentions, but they were taken away from their larger roles in the book. I loved getting to know the other patients in the novel, so it is a shame, however I did love the focus on the other patient Bobby. The creating of the relationship between Bobby and Craig as more of a focus relationship was really nice.

Overall?

Okay... Wow! I didn't expect so much negativity to come out of that. When writing this, I pretty much thought the film was a decent adaptation but as soon as I started pulling it apart, I think I must of gone a little crazy! I have written a lot of negative stuff about the changes but not enough about the positives! I think thats the problem with me being a much more negative person that positive. So overall, above I listed some of the issues I had with the adaptation. But in all it wasn't bad. I enjoyed the movie and as an adaptation it worked really well. I will always a little bit think its not a good enough reflection of the book, even though I know deep down that it really was. It may of had some issues but, hey its an adaptation and it isn't going to be word for word. There was a lot of stuff that worked really well, the atmosphere of the place and the characters were all intriguing. The storyline was followed almost to the point and I feel like it really does work.

Book and Film

So both of them? I really enjoyed both, the book I could really connect with and the film was a good adaptation that reminded me of the main plot points of the story. I hope to re-watch the film in a few years and see how I enjoy it then with more distance from the book. I was expecting both of them to hold a lot more emotion than they did, however the almost indie, comedic angle worked nicely and is something I didn't expect but did enjoy. At times I did find the comedy and light of the moment not personally favoured but then as we have found out, Laura is a depressingly negative person. The ending of both film and books worked really well and I still like the meaning behind it all, despite not like the listing with constant short sentences that went on just a little too long for my liking. 

Recommendations: 

I would recommend this book and film duo for anyone who is interested in a positive outlook on mental illness. I think both the film and book can be enjoyed separately and the film would be perfect for fans of The Perks of Being a Wallflower and fans of Emma Roberts. I really would recommend the book as even though its not my favourite it works well for what it is and I think there may be many people out there who could connect with the characters in the book. It is nice also to have a book and film with such a wide range of diverse characters within it as well, not only does it raise awareness of mental illness in young people, it also raises awareness of it in general, it also raises awareness of sexuality and gender and race. There is some more mature themes in the book and film looking at violence, self harm, suicide, mental illness, sex and drug use. 

Awesome book and film adaptation, let me know your thoughts on the book/film/both and if you haven't checked them out, I would say why not? Try it and see if it's your cup of tea :)

I would also like to include a review of the film and book I found online which I think keeps in line with my opinions of them both, It is pretty good :) :Shut up! I'm Reading

The Boy Who Swam With Piranhas

This is my review, taken off of my Goodreads page (http://www.goodreads.com/BookNerd94) on The Boy Who Swam With Piranhas by David Almond, enjoy :)

SO as part of my Fiction For Children Module for Creative Writing at Uni, I read this book 'The Boy Who Swam with Piranhas. I did not know what to expect, except a boy swimming with piranhas. This book is mostly aimed at young children, I would say from the age range of 8-12. I have to admit though I quite enjoyed this book despite being aimed at younger readers. I give it just under 4 stars, because I believe this book is really good at being what it is but because it's not ordinarily the type of book I would go for or enjoy as much. 

So the book, the plot centers around a young boy called Stan Potts, his parents died when he was younger and he lives with his Aunt Annie and Uncle Ernie. Uncle Ernie, I would say is a bit 'potty', excuse the pun there. He was made redundant from his fishing career and the harbor was shut down. Many of the employees were left in a bit of a stump. But Uncle Ernie tried to turn his life around, whilst turning his house pretty much upside down. He created a fish canning factory inside his house creating fish such as Pott's Pilchards. There was only the 3 of them working there, so in the end, Stan dropped out of school and they all spend everyday and hour working at the machinery. 

Now everything starts to change on Stan's birthday, Aunt Annie makes some rules so that Stan can go enjoy his birthday. He gets given ten pounds and goes to a fair that is on. There he has candyfloss and enjoys the carnival. However it is important to remember he has lived a very sheltered life so everything is new to him, it has been very long since he has even left his Aunt and Uncle's house. He gets his fortune read by Gypsy Rose who says she will be seeing him again and finds a Hook-A-Duck stall, where he feels sorry for the goldfish in bags so tries to get them all. He manages to and takes them home. Something occurs however which leaves Stan running away from home and joining the circus. 
We see Stan go on a journey, meeting different people and changing throughout the story. 

I thought this book was very well written, David Almond creates a loveable easy to read book that is very endearing. What compliments this book so well is the beautiful illustrations by Oliver Jeffers. Both Almond and Jeffers are well known more in terms of picture books so having these two create a more older book is very beautiful. 

I loved the childish humour within and the relationships between the character. Now I would not say they were entirely 3D and you may see this review as to praising towards this book, but considering the target age and the aim of it, I have considered it is not necessarily aimed for people like me to read. This I have taken into account when raiting and reviewing.

Now to a few extracts I really enjoyed so warning may be SPOILERS...

But, reader, lets leave this trio for a moment in their caravan. Let's have something like our own dream. Lets rise through the caravan roof and over this strange field filled with sideshows and rides and peculiar practices and magical moments and fires and chops and spuds and scorpions and fish and tents...Lets travel through the night and move closer to that place. How can we do this? You may well ask. But it's easy, isn't it? All it takes is a few words put into sentences, and a bit of imagination. We could go anywhere with words and our imaginations. We could leave this story altogether, in fact, and find some other story in some other part of the world, and start telling that one. But no. Maybe later. It's best not to leave our story scattered into fragments...

Now I don't really know what happens, the tone of the book starts to change a little now. However, I loved some of the things David Almond wrote! All it takes is a few words put into sentences, and a bit of imagination. We could go anywhere with words and our imaginations I just loved the way the readers are addressed, reminding me here a little of Jane Eyre ~('Reader, I married him')~
Also considering the reader is likely to be a 8-12 year old (not saying it has to be)the book in a way is teaching children how to write their own stories whilst they are following one themselves and I found that a really nice way to portray writing as well. This style crops up more nearer the end as well, one part I thought was intriguing was :

(view spoiler)

Now a lot of people think this is a cop out, and maybe it is. But I thought this was a very intriguing device in the book. Allowing the readers to make up their own mind and allowing them to understand story making but also reality versus fiction. Then again breaking apart a child's fantasy quite young can be seen as abominable but there is many depending factors on whether doing this was a good choice. I mean it allows the children to be able to make decisions themselves, they are not talked down to, they are allowed to decide whether punishment is really suitable for this really pathetic more humourous villain.

I am not sure about it in the book, but I am not going to lie and say I hated it when I found the different style enjoyable. The last chapter follows at first a similar pattern and I found it really nice different way to writing.

One other thing I would like to comment on is something I noticed in someone else's review, they commented upon how the bad grammar of the DAFT team was not suitable for children who were trying to learn to write and read. I understand where that reviewer was coming from but I would also like to throw a point in about characterisation. Bad Grammar a characteristic of bad people perhaps? I don't know. I will leave you to think upon that like the author leaves us to think upon the ending of Clarence :)

I hope you enjoyed my review, I would recommend this book to the age range its suited to or for anyone who wants to look into writing children fiction or anyone who wants to feel enchanted by being a bit of a kid again :)

Brave New World

This is my review, taken off of my Goodreads page (http://www.goodreads.com/BookNerd94) on Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, enjoy :)

Okay, so I have been wanting to read this book for around 2 and a half years, after delving into more modern classic dystopias.

(I don't know if that is right to say but I wanted to say not YA dystopia, as to me dystopia has been around so much longer and is slightly becoming tainted by the YA obsession - However saying that it won't stop me reading them and enjoying them) 

So when I finally picked up this book to read for uni, I was excited but also a bit apprehensive. Apprehensive you ask? Well when I had to slog through introductions and forewords about the book that I had yet to read, I become a bit nervous. Now don't get me wrong the introductions by Margaret Atwood and David Bradshaw were very good, BUT could they have not been put at the back of the book. I know I could of read the story first then the intros but I have a thing about chronological order. So skimming through these without knowing anything about the book put me on a rocky road of uneasiness. I will probably go back and read the intros now and be fine, It just felt s alien from me because I knew NOTHING and they were talking about things that did not make any sense AT THE TIME. 

Anyways, away from that slight drama...the book itself. As I said I was really looking forward to this but after a few pages I was very much 'huh?!?'.

So about 3 pages in, the disjointed listing overload of information had me doubting Huxley, the writing felt very fractured and I felt a barrier was brought up. I couldn't get into this world, yes it a very different alien one to our own society but I did not feel like I could take the book and plunge myself straight into it like I wanted to. The listing at first would of been okay if it did not go on for pages with no sign of a full stop anywhere and as a said a very disjointed narrative at first. However the details of the hatching centre were very intricate, yet I felt like Bam! Info Overload. 

(Now Please Before you think I am hating on a esteemed piece of work, check my rating and let me continue, because I will get into what was good :) )

Now chapter 3, I have something to say on...

I know Huxley was probably going for a choppy and quick narrative to create a certain atmosphere, but this chapter to me was HELL. There are four different scenes or voices occurring talking about different things. I became so confused and lost on who was talking that I felt the effectiveness of this narrative technique was diminished. I don't mind chopping and changing between say two scenes, but with clear distinction of the changes. I think Huxley was a bit overambitious with this part, there needed to be a bit more clear changes or scenes cut up a bit differently. Now the passage was interesting but very frustrating, I do however very much understand what Huxley was trying to present, to me it just did not work as well as it could of.

So now.... on to the good stuff!!!!

THIS WORLD! I love the way Huxley has created this Utopia world so different yet so close to our own! It's so imaginative and complex and intriguing. 

The social conditioning and the way the people in this world act are so peculiar but almost all seem happy. The control of the governing body is so astoundingly obvious to the reader but there is no doubt in the eyes of the people, except of course Bernard Marx. 

Now to me when Bernard and (I think) Lenina head over to the Savage reservation the book picked up. I really enjoyed the 'savage' aka John and when he came into the world that is so conditioned from birth. The idea of the outsider looking in and unable to participate in this world he has been told so much about by a mother who used to live there. I felt sorry for him in the end, the other guys were quite happy but his self destruction was painful to witness. 

I am trying here to really put everything I want to say in, but I finished this book a few days ago and have already read another so I hope this review can do this book justice. 

Two more things I really want to touch on is the sexual and motherhood aspect as well as the Directors words near the end. 

Now for our world the sexualness throughout this book is in some ways a stone throw away from our world. BUT its not, the weird conditioning that they undergo through birth creating the touchy feely and Orgy-Porgy, is very disturbing at the same time. Especially in the case of young children, which would in our society be very very taboo! Huxley explores taboo very well for the time he is writing for, as well as being relevant for today. He creates this almost god like character of the Ford that people worship like they would do a god in todays society, but it becomes so perverse and peculiar. Not to say that is a bad thing, I think Huxley's imagination and creativity in this world is outstanding. I like the way Huxley, made everything either quite subtle or the sexual tones where not very explicit unless read into. I know some parts this is not the case but I feel Huxley dealt with it rather well. 

Motherhood, is a foreign term for the people in this world, and I found it so hard to understand that, a bit like the savage John, being from the society we are from, the idea that these people are actually so incredibly alone yet together is so sad as well. As the book goes on, this perfect world becomes so un-perfect. People have no emotional ties to anyone, are constantly being drugged by Soma to stay completely happy and bliss (as not to cause any instability ) or to knock them out as to make them in a permanent state of blissful sleep for several days.

This society was founded as to stop wars and pain by eliminating anything that could cause instability. So although the idea of the society was right, they take out some aspects, such as emotional ties with relationships and motherhood, that make up humanity. The conservation between the Controller and the three men was very enlightening into the true nature of the world and you begin to not just despise this world but understand the creation of it. 

Overall this book made me tear my hair out at first but once I was in it I felt the wonder and beauty that is this world of Huxley's. I am giving it four stars purely based not just on the book, but the world created and the endings. And the ending is a shocker in some ways. 

I would recommend this to anyone who enjoys dystopias, who likes to see the ins and out of different world and politics.

Updated Youtube URL :)

BookNomming is my new URL for YouTube, I have posted quite a lot recently. I am still developing ideas for this blog and which direction to take it :)

Hey there!

Hi everyone,
It has been a while, I haven't been doing much blogging of late but feel free to check out my youtube channel!! I have entered the BookTubing Zone!!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdj80UJKHUTSiG7KI8N-WeA
:)

John Green - The Fault in Our Stars

I am starting with a review of a book I read a while ago, this was part of the work I did for my creative non fiction module of my degree :) Hope you like it :) This also can be seen on my goodreads account.

Book Review of ‘The Fault in Our Stars’ by John Green

I went into the staff room at work to check for any notices and thats when I saw the Boston blue shade of the cover amongst an array of unfamiliar books. My heart skipped a beat as I took in the sight of thousands of pages full of stories and excitement. I have an obsession. The smell of new paperbacks makes me giddy at the knees. The book somehow found its way into my hands, it must of been the whiff of a good story.
I then placed the three hundred and thirteen page book safely in my bag. Now before you think that I am a crazy book thief, I would like to say, I wasn’t stealing the book at all. One of the perks of working in a bookshop is the staff books which sit on the window sill whilst I eat my cheese sandwich and they scream
“Read Me!”.

John Greene. I had previously read his other young adult novel ‘Looking for Alaska’, and in enjoying this, however not profusely, I thought reading this book would be intriguing to compare this authors writing. Plus I can’t help picking up a good book!
This book has been reviewed before as ‘Damn near genius‘ and it highlights on the back cover four different words ‘INSIGHTFUL, BOLD, IRREVERENT, AND RAW’. Now if that isn’t catchy, then I don’t know what else is!

The book’s blurb also told me that the story revolves around a teenager called Hazel and her experience and ongoing battle against the big C. Now, I have read many young adult fiction that focuses on the theme of cancer, for example Jenny Downham’s ‘Before I Die‘ and Alice Kuipers ‘Life on the Refrigerator Door’. So when I heard this was another cancer themed book, I was a bit sceptical. Like the vampire and dark romance themes, I have a feeling that the cancer theme has a risk of being over done. Therefore when reading this I didn’t want to see just another book on the same theme, I wanted it to have some resonance and show me something different.

And it did.

John Green’s story is not one just about battles and celebrating life. It’s one about chance and luck.

I actually started reading the book about a month ago, I read 22 pages and at first was not gripped. But I had to stop and catch up with my reading for English, so was unable to be hooked by Green’s fishing line. However, after a few weeks I picked the book up again and got past the first few chapters and struggled to put the damn thing down!

In the first chapter, Hazel meets Augustus Waters at a Cancer Support group situated in the basement of a church. Hazel has to have oxygen tanks to support her breathing and Augusts has an amputated leg from a previous encounter with cancer. Throughout the story these two characters spend a lot of time together harmlessly flirting and then ending up together as a couple. However their luck has a turn for the worse and fate creates a cruel twist right near the end.

To me the novel did look at the cancer from a slightly different light, however I felt it could of been better. The book although having the plot twist, followed a similar storyline to other books that looked at this illness. The character is ill, she falls in love and then a tragedy occurs. On the other hand though, the characters depth made the book much more entertaining. The intelligent banter between Augustus and Hazel made for some aspects of humor within the novel. Also the use of the Cancer support group enabled readers to see more than one type of cancer and one type of character. As well as this, the use of the group listing all the names of the characters who had lost their battle to cancer emphasised the struggle that many people are going through today. The list of the people affected by cancer is endless and the illness has become a universal theme that most people can relate to. We all know someone who has had cancer or at least know someone who has known someone who has had it. Therefore, despite the story being similar to so many others out there, it highlights a important aspect of todays life.

When I look back at the book which I read at the beginning of the week, I find it difficult to remember particulars that I enjoyed or disliked. However, the story is one that I will keep in my head forever due to the amount of emotion that I managed to conjure up from the black print. I went from smiles, to laughter, to fear and then from all that to a hideous state of sobbing. Now when I say sobbing, I mean the works, the downpour of tears, the downright hideous runny nose and an array of tissues littered across my double bed spread. Now, I know what your thinking, this girl is probably emotionally unhinged, and maybe I am. But John Green’s hand had managed to reach out from the pages of his hope stealing book, grab on to my heart and rip it to pieces.

Despite going to bed at three in the morning with tired eyes and a mind full of despair, a book had wooed me once again. Maybe I am just an easy critic and a sucker for anything fiction. But this novel has been written beautifully and although there may be ‘fault in our stars’ , there is very little fault in Green’s writing.

And some quotey images to tempt you more to read this book :)

Kick Start to My Bookish Life

So, I have finally got round to launching this blog which I have wanted to do for a while. At present this is my second blog, my other blog being http://laurascakesandcrafts.blogspot.co.uk . I am looking to launch another blog in the next few weeks based on my creative writing solely.

So this blog...

As you may have already guessed is centred around one of my favourite things...Books! In this blog I hope to post reviews of some books, which I also post on my GoodReads account http://www.goodreads.com/BookNerd94. As well as this I plan on general chit chat on books and authors, quotes and anything you could possibly think of that is book related. This is really an introduction to kick start the blog. But feel free to comment and I hope you enjoy :D