Saturday, 20 June 2015

Review: This Is All: The Pillow Book of Cordelia Kenn by Aidan Chambers

This is All: The Pillow Book of Cordelia Kenn by Aidan Chambers

Rating: 5 out of 5 Stars *****

Summary:

This is All by Aidan Chambers is a coming of age story about 19 year old Cordelia. The book is heavily character based rather than plot based. Cordelia uses the form of the Japanese Pillow Book to compile the story of her teenage years and her thoughts. This is All is the last book in a sequence of six novels that explore different aspects of teenage love and self discovery. Each book is a stand alone novel, so it doesn't matter if you have read them or not to read this one. The book ends up as a compilation to give to her daughter in the future to help her through her teenage years.

Note: This book is not suitable for younger readers as it contains some parts that can be quite disturbing, triggering or adult themed.

What is a Japanese Pillow Book? 

On the blurb it says Cordelia:

'passionately needs to write and choosing the old and famous Japanese pillow book as her model, she compiles the story of her teenage years'

What a pillow book is can be found through a quick 'google' but Chambers gives us a beautiful definition on the title page: 

This book is split into six sections: Book one is The Red Pillow Box, Book two is The Green Pillow Box, Book Three - The Orange Pillow Box, Book Four - The Black Pillow Box and Book 5 - Yellow and Book 6 - Blue. The order of the pillow book is explained at the end of the novel, but the book is compiled beautifully together. 

The Green Pillow box is the one part of the book that took me the longest to read, as it has a very unusual format. The left hand side of the page is (a) and the right hand (b). It does get a little confusing as you don't know what way to read them as the (a) sides follow the (a) narrative and (b) sides follow the (b) narrative. You can choose whichever way you want to read it, even the author, chambers, suggests this. On his website he addressed the why the green pillow box is written that way which I will highlight some of his answer here but if you want to read the whole answer check out his website: http://www.aidanchambers.co.uk/thisisall.htm 

In reference to this part he says: 

In Book One of TIA the passages are not jumbled, but are arranged so that there is a storyline to follow, with 'pillow book' poems and lists and Cordelia's thoughts on various subjects placed in between the episodes of the story. These passages sometimes relate to the episodes of the story and sometimes don't. In other words, Book One is very like Sei Shonagon's book, except that it has a clear storyline. The reader is expected to read the pages of Book One in sequence as they would any novel. But of course, we know that readers can do as they like, and that sometimes they skip and come back to the skipped passages later, and so on.

In Book Two, however, the story episodes are all together without any interruption on the right hand (b) pages, and the pillow book passages are all together on the left hand (a) pages. There is a relationship between the (a) and (b) pages but it isn't immediately obvious. The reader has to decide how to read the Book. You might decide to read all the (b) pages - the story pages - first, and then come back and read all the pillow book passages on the (a) pages. Or vice versa: all the (a) pages first and then all the (b) pages. Or you might 'interleave' them, so to speak - in other words, mixing the (a) and (b) passages for yourself, as you feel like it

I decided to read the chapter of the book as a normal book, and didn't find myself confused apart from when I put the book down for a few hours or days. If you do decide to read the chapter as a normal book from (a) to (b) to (a) pages, I would recommend reading as much in one sitting as possible. But you can read bits a pieces of each part however you want and whatever ever works for you, as that is how the author intended it to be read. 

My opinion of the Book

I fell in love with this book, I have never read anything like it before and I struggle to put into words how amazing this book is. The book talks to you, you find yourself inside the book as much as you read the story of the characters. The lyrical and poignant language is wonderful and enchants the reader. The book is highly rate on goodreads with an average rating of 4.28 and its very deserving of it. If you love words and writing and books and poetry and in general the power of words, I believe you will love this book. It is a chunky 800+ pages, but it is truly worth it and not all pages are full up with written text from top to bottom as there are poems and lists that fill pages.  I got this book from the library and it breaks my heart to give it back because I feel this is one book that the copy you read means so much to you, I ended up filling the pages with sticky notes where I found quotes and passages I fell in love with and found I really related to and was gutted to take them all out to hand the book back. 

Lots of books impact me, but there are a rare amount of books that give me this feeling after reading them, I don't know whether it's enlightenment or just give me the power to think and the feeling of reading a beautifully written book, but this gave me a similar feeling to that of when I read Markus Muzak's The Book Thief over five years ago.  Although the book is not plot centred, I found myself wanting to read more and more, and the writing has something to do with that. The rest of my review is just going to be parts of the book I adored for you to see why and how this book is now one of my favourites that I will always remember and stay with me. Enjoy! And I really recommend this book, if you ever get a chance to read this, do :) 


Quotations and Passages I loved (THERE IS A LOT!):  
(P.S, some of these quotes are just for me, as future reference and documentation to remember my favourite bits, but I hope some of this intrigues you. I don't think any of these really spoil the book at all though)

p.29

'I like that phrase, 'beside myself', it's so right. At such time you do feel you're two people - the angry one exploding your body, and the other you, watching - calm, cool, scornful of your tiresome anger'. 

P.53

'Everyone wants to all someone into their most secret self. Everyone feels so alone inside their deepest wish is for someone to know their secret being, because then they are alone no longer' 

P.113

Here in the book, for Cordelia's 16th Birthday she is given a dictionary of every word Shakespeare has ever used or made and for me a lit student, this was amazing, I wanted my own copy! The book is feature often in the book and hope one day I can own something just like it, or it!: 


P.134

This quotation I loved, because one of modules at university was Literature and Psychoanalysis where I wrote an essay about Doctor Who and the use of the Uncanny and some of the research I looked at reminded me of this and I found it not only a reminder of really interesting theories but also beautifully written: 

' Mili-second of light- shadows caught by chemistry in the tomb of a camera. Photos are always memorials, the graves of ghosts. All photo albums are cemeteries' 


P.147 

Paths - 'How many feet make a path? All those previous soles still imprinted in the earth. All paths are history written in footprints. We keep them alive by reprinting them with our own footsteps. History dies without the present. There is no future without the path made to it by the past'. 

P.157

'There are times when I feel I could blow up the entire world and myself with it' 

P.200

This page Cordelia lists 'some beautiful things', this quote is for book lovers everywhere: 

'A well produced new book: the look, the smell, the sound, the feel of it in my hands as I open it for the first time. In my opinion, a well-made book is the most beautiful and user friendly object ever made by human beings' 

p.202

On the continued lists of beautiful things Cordelia talks about daffodils as they are brave. I loved this part as Daffodils are my favourite flowers. I found myself so much in the character of Cordelia. 

On this page she also talked about who she is writing to which I think is really interesting from a writers POV. 

Who am I writing to? 'Perhaps the self who writes is writing to, and writing for, one of more of my other selves. Maybe my readers are my other selves' 

P.208

This is a poem Cordelia includes and it really spoke to me. 

' Sometimes
I wish I 
Were what I 
Was when I
Wished I were
What I am now' 

p.224

This section sees Cordelia write about old sayings made new + Unusual and amusing words. This part I highly recommend as it breaks apart language we don't think anything about and finds words that are perfect for using in places where you didn't know there was a word for it. 

P.260/262
 On these pages Cordelia talks about why she loves rain and English weather and this part really spoke to me as it summed up my own thoughts about rain and English weather and how wonderful it is and how lucky I am to live in a climate that is so varied and changing. 

p.264

Cordelia talks about footnoting and the conundrum about them being in a book and how to read them which I really loved and found interesting. What do you think about footnotes in a book, do they distract you from the story or do you enjoy them? 

Before I highlight one of my favourite parts of the books I want to include a few more pages I really loved. 

p.276 - sleep
p.310 - past present and future
p.487 - chapter 15
p.496/7 - what is imagination?
p.550-552 - bed
p.569 - future and being decisive 
p.570/571 changing from a child to an adult and the way what we think and act differs so much
p.681 - learning
p.688 - studying English lit and careers
p.752
and The Afterword

As you can see this book I found myself wanting to highlight everything and write on the pages, but I couldn't because it was a library book. But here is one of my favourite bits :P 

p.562-563








The End :)  I hope you enjoyed this review, It is very different to my normal ones, mostly because I didn't know how to describe this book other than show you through the language and quotations I adored. Let me know if you have read this book or plan on reading it :) 



Sunday, 5 April 2015

'Currently Reading' ...

Okay, if anyone has ever been on my GoodReads they will soon realise that I am crazy. And when I say Crazy, this is what I mean....

On my shelving system I have a lot of books, a lot is probably an understatement: 

Read (573) : Now to me this is nothing, tip of the iceberg crazy. In 21 years of life I have put as any books as I can remember reading throughout my life on this so far. I started GoodReads in 2009, and pretty much since then recorded a on-the-go record of my reading, so most of the detailed reviews come from the books that I have read since 2009. However, as I said, I have put a lot of childhood books on there, not to up my read pile, but more of a reminder of the books I used to read, books I may want to re-read, books I may want to share with my future children. So to me, this number is not crazy crazy... especially in the book world. However, I know some people will think it is. 

Next...

Currently reading (8): As you can tell from the title of this post, it's about books I am currently reading, so I will come back to this one. And this is quite crazy as it is. 

To Read (6852): Yes, you read that correctly 6852... that is six thousand, eight hundred and fifty two.... 

I am crazy. I will never read all those books. and I know it.... hell I don't own that many either... take away 6000 and you have a rough amount of the books I own (which is still a hell of a lot). My To Read is so high, for many reasons:

1. I like books.... I know, we already gathered that! But I will see a lot of books, and go 'hey, that looks good' and add it because hey... it looked good. I am not picky, I will try anything once and read a wide variety of genres. 
2. I started GoodReads in 2009... I know I already said, but at that time I was 15? Here is where my maths fails me... but the point is my book taste has also changed, there are many books on there that I probably don't want to read anymore... you are probably thinking, why doesn't she take them off... Well I really see taking the time to go through almost 7000 books, not the best use of my time... 
3. Free Books, okay this is probably not the best reason... GoodReads giveaways used to (nowhere near as much now) take up a few hours of my time a week. I used to scroll through to find any books that seem interesting and entered for a free copy. However, this meant that I ended up adding them all to me To Read list too... Now I used to add a lot of books that looked on moderately  interesting because I couldn't resist freebies. Now, I don't add books unless I am really interested... space is an issue. However, I read some books I never thought I would enjoy through that method and found genres that I would have never found before.
4. Okay... basically old me, had a lot of spare time...


My shelves on GoodReads are BIG, so choosing what to read is always a challenge. The challenge does not start with my enormous To Read pile though. It starts with Currently Reading...

I have 8 books I am 'Currently Reading'... I have put it in inverted commas because I am not really reading them right now... I never used to have so many books I was currently reading until I started university. I used to stick to one book at a time and that was easy and simple. But university meant I had to be reading several books at the same time. It also meant that I had to put down books often to pick up a new one, only to put that one down unfinished and start another.... see the pattern? When I started uni back up in January, I was currently reading one book, but had to put it down for uni and ever since then uni reading has got in the way of picking it up, and each one of them I have had to put down for another book for uni... So my 'currently reading' looks a little bit like this: 





How did I get into this mess?

Let's start by the one that has been on there for the longest amount of time:

The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes.

This book was added May last year, I was reading it ... for uni. Now the reason it is still up there is that it is all short stories. I have read all but three or four of them. For this reason I cannot see the point of taking it of the 'currently reading' shelve to To Read, as I have almost finished it... But I also cannot bring myself to say I have Read it... when I haven't... not cover to cover. Short stories are good, but I find a collection of them I never read all of them. Hence, quite often they sit in the middle ground of 'currently reading' until I feel like reading the last few stories... 

Allegiant 

Okay, I started reading this series over christmas break. In all honesty I am not enjoying as much as I hoped, it's okay... kind of overhyped. But that is for another day... This book I read probably only 20 pages until I thought, I really need to get on with uni reading before I go back for semester two. The book has sat there ever since. 

Now That I've Found You

A Review copy I received. I tried to read this before it's release date but as with Allegiant.. Uni took over my life. 

... And The Rest of the Books....

All the uni books, I have started and had to put down to start another one, or to start an essay, or to write a dissertation.... 

So I have Finished uni now, no more books to read. I am free to read my own books now! But this 'currently reading' shelve is interfering with my freedom. How do I choose which book to read when I have all this I have started, staring at me and judging me for putting them down barely read. So what do I do? Part of me just wants to wipe the slate clean, clear my 'currently reading' shelve and choose my next book with the freedom to know that there is no other book my time is committed to. But I feel like doing that I am committing myself to an endless cycle of books that I may not be 'currently reading' but in my head I know I am... I know that if I take them off, I will have to re-read all that I have already read... and hence, the book becomes not as enjoyable because I have to push myself through to get to the part I haven't read... in order to say that book is done. That makes me seem like I am not reading the books for enjoyment... but I am... all the books on my 'Currently Reading' pile are all books that look really good or interesting. But do I have the time to give them the attention a few years down the line, to the parts I have already read? So I am stuck... stuck between the books I have started, but not reading, and the huge pile of books To Read that is endless and feels like freedom right now. After university, I am yearning that freedom, that endless possibility of choice to what I pick up next. 

So what do I do?

How far into a book are you, when you are actually 'reading it'. I have books that I have read 10 pages off, books that I have read 100 pages off and books that I am over half way through. If I am only 10 pages through though, have I really started the book? 

So for peace of mind, do I clear all the books off that I haven't really started? If I am only a few pages in, will it make a difference to me re-reading just them few pages really. 

In that case off comes The Devil Wears Prada, The Marlowe Papers, Allegiant...

But the Borrowers, won't take me long to read... I can read that in a day, even though I am only a few pages through... And A Thousand Acres, have I only just begun or am I halfway there...  Do I include that I have actually started to re-read Uglies, even though it's not on my 'currently reading' shelve?

Welcome to the trials and tribulations of the 'currently reading' shelve, where your soul is tortured through books you have started and want to finish, but they are like tiny chains tying you down to them, even though you haven't read them in ages. When does reading turn from become a hobby, a thing you enjoy, to a indecisive battle between the millions of books that exist? I am just overwhelmed by the choices of books in the world, or am I lazy abandoner who doesn't like to finish what they have started? Or am I just reading too many books, because I using random household objects for bookmarks...


Maybe I am just making this more difficult than it actually is.... 
Sometimes you need to just pick up a book and start.... instead of contemplating over everything. 

My advice to myself... Just Read! 




Review: Popular: Vintage Wisdom for a Modern Geek By Maya Van Wagenen


Popular: Vintage Wisdom for A Modern Geek By Maya Van Wagenen

Rating: 4 out of 5 Stars ****

Plot:

Popular: Vintage Wisdom for a Modern Geek, follows the journey of thirteen year old Maya as she goes from a 'social outcast' to 'popular'. That is the very oversimplified plot though. Maya has always been a social outcast and one day she comes across a 1950's guide to being popular and decides she will follow a different chapter each month and experiment to whether the advice given in the 1950s is still fitting today. From hair and make-up to confidence, Maya takes each piece of advice and tries to apply it to her life in the 21st Century. Through this she discovers what it really means to be 'popular'.

Review:

Okay, so I have mixed feelings on this book, I would give a 3.5/4 stars because of this. Let's start of on a negative note so I can end positively. I think one of the things that I didn't like about the book, which I have found many people have said on GoodReads, is that it is too 'nice'. By that I mean at times it was too sickly-sweet. I found that despite being perceived as not popular and bullied a little, Maya already has quite a happy life. However, that being said she does learn a lot through the process... ( we will come back to that). One of my bigger issues was that someone so young was dieting and worried about body image, even though the end doesn't promote this, the book still goes through chapters and chapters highlighting how Maya changes herself to make herself popular. The end doesn't follow this message, but Maya has still taken on advice to change herself and image, as to become more popular. Maya's age can be seen throughout her writing sometimes, however most of the time she writes really well. I think with age and practice though, she will become a better writer. There may be a few other small points that I wasn't happy with at the time of reading, but  I want to go on to the positives for now.

So first of, I want to say Maya must have been really brave to experiment with some of the ideas in this book, from wearing pantaloons to talking to people she has never talked to before. Maya jumps completely outside her comfort zone and encourages you to do so to. However, even though Maya does encourage the reader, I will probably not do much moving outside my comfort zone, maybe because I am lot older than the Maya, but I feel sometimes the book suggests you have to force yourself to impress others. I feel safer in my private cocoon. Anyway, despite the issues with some of the chapters, the end picked up for me... and although I wanted to shake Maya throughout the book and tell her that popularity does not matter, in the end she realises so.

One part I would have liked to know more about was the area she lived in, I don't know anything about the kind of life people live in that area apart from what Maya tells me and from Drills due to armed robberies across the street from their school and gangs, I want to know more about the area.

The end of the book is what really made the book for me... so SPOILER ALERTS FROM HERE ON....


*********************************************************************************


The last few chapters were what made the book, for me, able to reach 4 stars. Now this was because the body image ideal was thrown away and it was more about confidence and being yourself. When Maya does a week where she sits with each different table of people at her school, from 'social outcasts' to 'Football Fanatics', I loved the fact she was breaking the status quo. But doing so she wasn't just doing something to meet new people, but doing something that made a statement to the people around her. People can mingle, you don't have to be in one particular group to talk to a particular type of people. At my school, we did have 'popular' people, but the groups weren't like how American High School is presented on TV or in books. We just had friendship groups in the end, and they weren't exclusive either. But at Maya's school this 'ideal' stood and she was able to break it. Her  actions didn't just change herself, but the people around her. I also love the fact that she interviews people on what being popular is and whether they are popular. I would have loved more of this interview technique throughout the book, a bit like Candance Bushnell's Sex and The City , journalist idea. I would have liked to know what other people thought about clothes, hair, skin etc...

I wanted to also know more about her family as well, I felt that although the story was about Maya's journey that her family had some interesting characters and there is potential for more stories surrounding them?

Below I will insert some quotations I really loved and why :) :


This quote I really love because it is true. When tragedy strikes, the barriers disappear between groups of people. As a human response we respond to another persons pain and we can see this through just watching films and reading books. However, I would also like to add that big celebrations also break down boundaries, a happy event can allow everyone to express themselves. But we are all human is what Maya is really saying.


This one may be a little difficult to see, but is says 'Why is everyone so scared of one another?'. This I feel links a lot to the previous quotation. I like this one, because if you walk around, you find that people try not to talk or make eye contact with one another. ( I should know, I do this too) Especially in the UK and in big cities. Maya asks an important question. Why are we scared? or more importantly why am I scared?


This one is also not very clear, late night reading, equals late night quotation photographs. This one I found resonated a lot to me. I am the latter in the equation though.



Overall, I really enjoyed this book, I feel it aimed a lot younger than me and I feel like some of the book was hard to relate to. However, the messages that Maya leaves at the end is easily relatable to teenagers. I loved some of the writing style, and some of the thoughts Maya puts across, and feel that she is an author to look out for in the future. I feel this books will be beneficial because of the overall message for teenagers, however I hope they don't find themselves dieting and changing their look just to be come 'popular'.  I feel without the book Maya would have experimented with some of the things in the book anyway and found her own voice and style as part of growing up. But I guess it is always helpful to have a guiding voice a long the way through Betty, which know Maya can provide to others.


Recommend to: teenagers who believe the concept of popularity needs to change and want to find out what popularity really means.


Popularity is just a social concept: the idea that certain people are seen as better for having more friends or being a certain way. Remember, it's not how many friends you have, it's the type of friends you have. 


Thursday, 5 March 2015

WORLD BOOK DAY


If you didn't know already, today is World Book Day :D One of my favourite days of the year, which some people will think is a little sad, but for a book lover, who can really blame me. A day to celebrate everything bookish? I mean what is better?

Unfortunately I won't be doing much bookish things this year, I haven't really done much in the past few years though. However, I am writing this post because World Book Day means a lot to me, and even though I have dissertations and essays to write, I want to share with you what World Book Day means to me.

I have always have fond memories of books in general from when I was younger, but World Book Day is something that does stand out. The only thing I don't like about World Book Day is that it kind of goes off your radar once you finish secondary school and if you no longer work with children or books. There is not much around for adults on World Book Day, it's very focused on the children. Which makes me sad because books aren't just for children, I guess once a lot of people leave school they leave reading behind with it. But not me :) But I don't mind the focus on children for World Book Day, without it I wouldn't have so many fond memories of it.

First thing is the dressing up! Now me and my family took dressing up seriously. We made costumes and put together things we had around the house for World Book Day. Going into school with all the teachers and all the students (apart from the odd few) dressed up as character and having to guess what book they were from. Trying to remember all the different costumes I wore over my childhood years is impossible. But I remember in Year 6, dying to dress up as Tracy Beaker from Jacqueline Wilson's books and the BBC TV series. The frustration of this, was for a girl who had dead straight hair that refused to curl, it was kind of difficult to dress up as a girl with black crazy curls. Yet, despite the let down in my basic biology, I still dressed up as Tracy Beaker for the day.

Another of my memories of dressing up for World Book Day comes from me and my sister dressing up as the queen of hearts. Now I have to say my mum is pretty amazing at helping with these costumes, she would find simple things and make them look amazing. We had our own little trays with Jam Tarts on (not real ones though) and little hearts painted on our cheeks. For me the whole part of dressing up on World Book Day was really opening up your imagination with it, really getting stuck in with your creativity and immersing yourself into the world of fictional characters. I have other days at school where we dressed up and I loved them all, I can't remember whether some of them was for World Book Day or not though. The two instance above though I remember as distinctly being World Book Day.


The funny thing is, on my 18th birthday... it may not have been World Book Day, but I basically created that... Everyone had to come dressed up as a book character and the whole party was book themed as much as we possibly could. Thanks to my mum again who even though probably would say she isn't but she is. She is such a creative person and comes up with some amazing ideas to create costumes and food and decorations. I think she has really taught me that it's the simple silly details that make it all worth it sometimes, in life particularly. I was dressed up as Elizabeth Bennet from Pride and Prejudice <3 I think I need to write a post about dressing up as looking back through old pictures, so many fond memories of just dressing up. I mean who doesn't love a bit of fancy a dress... okay I know not everyone does. But it's a bit of fun and I love it :D AND CHECK OUT BUZZFEED'S 2015 WORLD BOOK DAY COSTUMES!!!! THE CUTENESS!!! http://www.buzzfeed.com/patricksmith/kids-who-are-winning-world-book-day?bffb&utm_term=4ldqphz#.hprOPj2JY


Next up is the Book fairs! Oh how I loved having the school hall filled with books and wondering around looking at all the endless possibilities there were, the endless amounts of worlds, characters and journeys I could embark on. I brought some good books from those fairs. If only I could remember some of them right now!

Okay next up is a little thing and it may be a little materialistic but oh well.... it's the £1 off book Tokens! I don't even think it was the fact I got a £1 off a book or could get a book for free out of a small chosen selection. To me it was all part of the package that is World Book Day. Sadly, I am too old to get a pound of a book, but then again I have the money to pay an extra pound anyway. But that little voucher was one of the best presents you could get... Well me anyway. When I got into secondary school I remember as the years went on, less and less people wanted the book vouchers and knowing I was such a book obsessed person, I would end up with a pile of book tokens people no longer wanted. I wasn't complaining :P

I generally love the idea of World Book Day. Books are such a big part of my life, they may not be a big part of other people's lives... and I won't ever disrespect them because of that. But I feel like everyone has a memory of reading a book they loved, whether at school or later in life. And if they haven't, I believe that book is still out there waiting for them. Because I honestly believe with the millions and millions of books out there, there is at least one book that will suit you, whether non-fiction, romance, YA, fantasy and sci-fi, crime etc... You will find your book if you haven't.

So my plan for today may not be very book involved, but I hope in the future to become a big part of World Book Day. I want to promote reading and the love and enjoyment of books. I am currently looking at library jobs for after Uni and if I do go into that career, I really really can't wait for World Book Day as a librarian :)





Image sources: Photographs - My own,  Book Token: http://www.judgemeadow.leicester.sch.uk/_files/images/Learning/English/World%20Book%20Day%202013/446E99235E872CF6ED362D9998544787.jpg,
World Book Day Logo: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/510377084967866368/nMRh8YrN_400x400.jpeg

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

'It's Kind of a Funny Story', Movie and Book Comparison

I recently read Ned Vizzini's 'It's Kind of a Funny Story'. I finished it a few days ago, but the original plan was to read the book as part of one of the challenges of Book-Tube-Athon. That challenge was to read a book and then watch the movie adaptation of it. Now that did not really go to plan and I didn't start the book until a week or so after the readathon challenge ended, but I was determined to stick to my TBR, even if it meant reading it a week or two after I planned. As mentioned on my YouTube channel, I accidentally acquired the book and film in July, (a present that was suppose to be for my sister and it turned out she had both of them already), I knew my sister really wanted to read the book and I knew it had good reviews, so I thought why not read it?! That and the topic matter really intrigued me, I wanted to see how the book would portray mental illness and how the character was affected by it.


So to start my comparison, I thought it best to include my review of the Vizzini's book first. Now when I include my review, it may not be very articulate and amazing. My grammar and spelling is often appalling in these reviews, mostly because I tend to finish the books at unearthly hours of the morning, I insist on reviewing them in case I forget anything. This review is my reaction straight after finishing the book and how it impacted me. I have taken this review from my goodreads account: BookNerd94
Review
On Goodreads  I gave this book 4 stars, however I found it hard to place as I had mixed feelings about the book. I read this book from the 24-26 July 2014.


3/4 stars, I enjoyed this book but found myself skim reading some bits and wanting something extra t0 the story. However mostly good bits about the book. Respects to Ned Vizzini who used his own knowledge to influence him in the writing of this book , also RIP, I was saddened and shocked to find out that despite everything, he died last year. 

Anyway the story.

From the very beginning I found myself weirdly reflected in the main characters thoughts and actions. No, not all of them. But some of them felt very familiar, for example the cycle system Craig talks about as a way of thinking when he is panicking or anxious. I can really relate to that, as a natural born panicker who escalates things constantly in their mind, I started to see some of my odd and more frustrating traits reflected back at me. Another thing I related to was the food issues, something I have never understood myself, but I have always had a bad relationship with food and some of the experiences of throwing up from being anxious was something I wasn't a stranger too. 

Vizzini from his own experience creates a character that thousands of people can relate to if going through or have gone through a similar thing. This books is helpful for people who have ever felt low and second guessed themselves. 

The ending although irritating in it's form and structure, made a clear point that I loved. Feeling low and depressed is not about being cured, it's about managing it. Everyone will have bad times but it's about managing and fighting against the urge to lay down and let it consume you. 

I wouldn't say this was my favourite book in the world and it didn't really make me emotional at all. But I fond this book to be simple and meaningful. It was a more realistic look at something that is now affecting a large proportion of young people and a helpful reminder that you can conquer your demons, because you are, in fact, the one in control. 

Weirdly I enjoyed the first half a bit more than the second, I know it picks up after about 200 pages but I felt the beginning was more poignant. Also I loved the relationship between Noelle and Craig, even though it was a bit of love at first sight, and I'm doubtful it will be a forever love despite loving happy endings. It just was a nice relationship between the two of them. 

In general I loved all the different characters they all really stood out to me. Even though I got confused with so many and who worked there and who didn't, once or twice, I still like the complexity and true nature of mental illness presented in the novel 

I am really glad I read this and look forward to watching the film this week, hoping to do do a review comparison of the two as even after only seeing the trailer, I can tell they are going to be two very different entities.

 So that was my review of the book, 4 days later I found some time to sit and watch the film, I would of like to watch it a bit sooner after reading the book but I felt giving me some distant from the book enabled me to enjoy the film without losing enjoyment because 'It's not exactly like the book' and still be able to give a comparison of the two. 


So my review! Lets start of with the first question. WARNING: Starts positive and then somehow turns really negative even though I did enjoy the movie and thought it was really good.

Did the film reflect the book well?

At first when the film started rolling I wanted to shout at the screen and say no, but that was two minutes in, before I had even given the film a chance! Granted I went into the film, after seeing the trailer, very hesitant that it would reflect the book well at all. But I think I deserve a slap at my attitude, especially so early on. The story starts of at the Brooklyn Bridge and thats when I got angry that the film didn't follow the book... but then it did... I felt like such an idiot. The beginning followed  the book just fine! Anyway as to the rest of the film, once I had relaxed on my brain having to think that the film wouldn't live up to the novel, I realised something. For a film this book worked really well, it stayed very close to the story line and the atomsphere of the novel came across really well on the screen. 

Was it a good movie?

As I thought to the book, the movie was okay. I don't think it was a film I loved, I know it won't be in my top 20 films of all time. But it was enjoyable all the same. I would give the film 3/4 stars, same as the book.

Casting Choices and Character Portrayal?
(I won't talk on all the characters but just the main few and not all our judgements on who played the character but how the characters were made to be seen too)


  • Craig played by Keir Gilchrist: I have never seen anything before with Keir in, well not that I know of, so that made it hard to judge whether I enjoyed his acting as an actor overall. In this case however, I feel he made a good portrayal of the character of Craig. However, I felt that sometimes he appeared to happy for someone who had just been admitted to a mental hospital. (Don't hate on me, I just thought sometimes he had a lot more confidence than in the book)That may have been due to the script, but sometimes I felt he didn't portray the characters thought processes as well as is portrayed in the book. As appearance, I thought Keir worked well, he wasn't exactly how my mind envisioned him, but he was a close match.
  • Noelle played by Emma Roberts: I have seen a lot of Emma Roberts work, and have really enjoyed it, most of them I saw in my young/mid teens, but I have enjoyed watching films with her in. Acting wise, I don't think she was bad, she took the role and made it work. There were sometimes when I found she was a bit more outgoing towards Craig when I found her to be a lot more shyer in the book. Also I found that the character wasn't explored enough and there is parts in the book where there is a lot more to her as a person. Appearance wise, I love Emma Roberts... but I don't think she fitted that well, Too hollywood. I think sometimes the characters are not portrayed enough as real people and Noelle looked a bit too much that way. The only other pet peeve was the scars on Noelles face, the story tells of a more mutilation and although the wounds are healing they still appear a bit rugged. The film makes them look most of the time very clean cut. 
  • Bobby played by Zach Galifianakis: I have seen Zach in quite a few things, Hangover and Due Date. Both comedy roles. This role as Bobby was a lot more troubled and although not a comedy like Zach's other films, he still kept that twinkle that fitted with the almost ironic indie humour that was featured throughout. I liked Zach's acting and found it worked well in the film. The character of Bobby was made a lot more central to the storyline as well, which was interesting to watch in terms of the relationship between Bobby and Craig worked out. 
  • Lynn played by Lauren Graham: Famous for Gilmore Girls, The Pacifier, Evan Almighty and much more and a very beautiful lady. I was intrigued to the casting of Lauren as Craig's mum, It seemed that there was lot of big stars caught to make this film. Not having a large role in the film, I felt it was hard to judge her character. But in the book Lynn's character was a little big bigger and I found on screen that the character didn't seem to connect with her child as much in the book and I imagined a lot more feeling and concern for her son. Sometimes the words she were saying didn't match up with her facial expressions. Although she worked well in the scene when Craig was younger.
  • George played by Jim Gaffigan: Similar to Craigs' mum, I felt the emotion was missing. One of the scenes they missed out which I will talk about later, I felt was important to establish the relationship between father and son. I had nothing wrong with the actor in this case, it was more the script. I felt that that relationship wasn't very strong and the characters of the parents were very much eliminated from the movies as much as possible. 


Parts that where changed?
Okay, so for this I have just picked out a few things I can think of off the top of my head. I know there is more but I will add them in the future if they come to me.

Parents: so as I said previously,  the parents in the story became less important and were more small roles to the side than the larger roles they play in the book. This wasn't a completely bad thing but when the scenes did pop up, I felt that the parents were most of the time just stand ins. The sister worked well and felt more like a sibling, but the parents role sometimes felt pointless in the film. As mentioned above a scene from the book where Craig's dad brings over a film and stays to watch some of it with the patients is cut out. This I found quite sad as the film portrays Craig's dad as someone who is not really around due to work and only cares about his child's education, which if I'm not mistaken, I felt reading the book wasn't true. I felt that the father in the book was a lot more interval in his sons life and the scene they changed and cut out would have shown that a bit more.

Music Scene and 'Under Pressure': This scene I was unsure of, the very comical and almost tacky outfits and design took me for surprise in the context of the film. I am still not sure as to whether this worked. I am not very used to humour in these type of films and I found it hard to know whether it was funny or not. However, the signing of Under Pressure worked really well. A perfect song in terms of the reasons for why Craig was depressed. But... yes there is a but... I found that the film didn't portray the reasons as to why Craig was depressed very well. The film portrayed Craig as having very little reasons to his depression and although that can be the case, in the book it was mentioned heavily that some of the cause was pressure at his new school. Plus... SPOILER... the book talks of how he changes schools, the film doesn't give any indication of that. I know that the film has to create a focus however, so trying to focus on all the many small things would be difficult in a film.

Workings of brain: Yes, the one thing that made me really enjoy the book was the working of Craig's brain and how it was portrayed in the book as cycling and there was a lot more emphasis on what was going on up there. Yes, there was the narration over hear by Craig, but I felt sometimes if I hadn't read the book I would of found the film not as interesting. 

The way the past was weaved in:  The past was weaved in a little differently to the book, I actually think this worked well, particularly because the action in the novel does not start until about 200 pages in. It made sense to start where the books action began, even if it meant some of the memories and past that helped me understood Craig as a character a bit more had to be reduced or taken out.

Other Patients and focus on Bobby: Another thing I am torn whether it was done well was the way the other patients where hardly focused on in the film. There was introductions and small mentions, but they were taken away from their larger roles in the book. I loved getting to know the other patients in the novel, so it is a shame, however I did love the focus on the other patient Bobby. The creating of the relationship between Bobby and Craig as more of a focus relationship was really nice.

Overall?

Okay... Wow! I didn't expect so much negativity to come out of that. When writing this, I pretty much thought the film was a decent adaptation but as soon as I started pulling it apart, I think I must of gone a little crazy! I have written a lot of negative stuff about the changes but not enough about the positives! I think thats the problem with me being a much more negative person that positive. So overall, above I listed some of the issues I had with the adaptation. But in all it wasn't bad. I enjoyed the movie and as an adaptation it worked really well. I will always a little bit think its not a good enough reflection of the book, even though I know deep down that it really was. It may of had some issues but, hey its an adaptation and it isn't going to be word for word. There was a lot of stuff that worked really well, the atmosphere of the place and the characters were all intriguing. The storyline was followed almost to the point and I feel like it really does work.

Book and Film
So both of them? I really enjoyed both, the book I could really connect with and the film was a good adaptation that reminded me of the main plot points of the story. I hope to re-watch the film in a few years and see how I enjoy it then with more distance from the book. I was expecting both of them to hold a lot more emotion than they did, however the almost indie, comedic angle worked nicely and is something I didn't expect but did enjoy. At times I did find the comedy and light of the moment not personally favoured but then as we have found out, Laura is a depressingly negative person. The ending of both film and books worked really well and I still like the meaning behind it all, despite not like the listing with constant short sentences that went on just a little too long for my liking. 

Recommendations: 
I would recommend this book and film duo for anyone who is interested in a positive outlook on mental illness. I think both the film and book can be enjoyed separately and the film would be perfect for fans of The Perks of Being a Wallflower and fans of Emma Roberts. I really would recommend the book as even though its not my favourite it works well for what it is and I think there may be many people out there who could connect with the characters in the book. It is nice also to have a book and film with such a wide range of diverse characters within it as well, not only does it raise awareness of mental illness in young people, it also raises awareness of it in general, it also raises awareness of sexuality and gender and race. There is some more mature themes in the book and film looking at violence, self harm, suicide, mental illness, sex and drug use. 
Awesome book and film adaptation, let me know your thoughts on the book/film/both and if you haven't checked them out, I would say why not? Try it and see if it's your cup of tea :)
I would also like to include a review of the film and book I found online which I think keeps in line with my opinions of them both, It is pretty good :) :Shut up! I'm Reading




Thursday, 19 September 2013

The Boy Who Swam With Piranhas

This is my review, taken off of my Goodreads page (http://www.goodreads.com/BookNerd94) on The Boy Who Swam With Piranhas by David Almond, enjoy :)



SO as part of my Fiction For Children Module for Creative Writing at Uni, I read this book 'The Boy Who Swam with Piranhas. I did not know what to expect, except a boy swimming with piranhas. This book is mostly aimed at young children, I would say from the age range of 8-12. I have to admit though I quite enjoyed this book despite being aimed at younger readers. I give it just under 4 stars, because I believe this book is really good at being what it is but because it's not ordinarily the type of book I would go for or enjoy as much. 


So the book, the plot centers around a young boy called Stan Potts, his parents died when he was younger and he lives with his Aunt Annie and Uncle Ernie. Uncle Ernie, I would say is a bit 'potty', excuse the pun there. He was made redundant from his fishing career and the harbor was shut down. Many of the employees were left in a bit of a stump. But Uncle Ernie tried to turn his life around, whilst turning his house pretty much upside down. He created a fish canning factory inside his house creating fish such as Pott's Pilchards. There was only the 3 of them working there, so in the end, Stan dropped out of school and they all spend everyday and hour working at the machinery. 

Now everything starts to change on Stan's birthday, Aunt Annie makes some rules so that Stan can go enjoy his birthday. He gets given ten pounds and goes to a fair that is on. There he has candyfloss and enjoys the carnival. However it is important to remember he has lived a very sheltered life so everything is new to him, it has been very long since he has even left his Aunt and Uncle's house. He gets his fortune read by Gypsy Rose who says she will be seeing him again and finds a Hook-A-Duck stall, where he feels sorry for the goldfish in bags so tries to get them all. He manages to and takes them home. Something occurs however which leaves Stan running away from home and joining the circus. 
We see Stan go on a journey, meeting different people and changing throughout the story. 

I thought this book was very well written, David Almond creates a loveable easy to read book that is very endearing. What compliments this book so well is the beautiful illustrations by Oliver Jeffers. Both Almond and Jeffers are well known more in terms of picture books so having these two create a more older book is very beautiful. 

I loved the childish humour within and the relationships between the character. Now I would not say they were entirely 3D and you may see this review as to praising towards this book, but considering the target age and the aim of it, I have considered it is not necessarily aimed for people like me to read. This I have taken into account when raiting and reviewing.

Now to a few extracts I really enjoyed so warning may be SPOILERS...

But, reader, lets leave this trio for a moment in their caravan. Let's have something like our own dream. Lets rise through the caravan roof and over this strange field filled with sideshows and rides and peculiar practices and magical moments and fires and chops and spuds and scorpions and fish and tents...Lets travel through the night and move closer to that place. How can we do this? You may well ask. But it's easy, isn't it? All it takes is a few words put into sentences, and a bit of imagination. We could go anywhere with words and our imaginations. We could leave this story altogether, in fact, and find some other story in some other part of the world, and start telling that one. But no. Maybe later. It's best not to leave our story scattered into fragments...



Now I don't really know what happens, the tone of the book starts to change a little now. However, I loved some of the things David Almond wrote! All it takes is a few words put into sentences, and a bit of imagination. We could go anywhere with words and our imaginations I just loved the way the readers are addressed, reminding me here a little of Jane Eyre ~('Reader, I married him')~
Also considering the reader is likely to be a 8-12 year old (not saying it has to be)the book in a way is teaching children how to write their own stories whilst they are following one themselves and I found that a really nice way to portray writing as well. This style crops up more nearer the end as well, one part I thought was intriguing was :

(view spoiler)

Now a lot of people think this is a cop out, and maybe it is. But I thought this was a very intriguing device in the book. Allowing the readers to make up their own mind and allowing them to understand story making but also reality versus fiction. Then again breaking apart a child's fantasy quite young can be seen as abominable but there is many depending factors on whether doing this was a good choice. I mean it allows the children to be able to make decisions themselves, they are not talked down to, they are allowed to decide whether punishment is really suitable for this really pathetic more humourous villain.

I am not sure about it in the book, but I am not going to lie and say I hated it when I found the different style enjoyable. The last chapter follows at first a similar pattern and I found it really nice different way to writing.

One other thing I would like to comment on is something I noticed in someone else's review, they commented upon how the bad grammar of the DAFT team was not suitable for children who were trying to learn to write and read. I understand where that reviewer was coming from but I would also like to throw a point in about characterisation. Bad Grammar a characteristic of bad people perhaps? I don't know. I will leave you to think upon that like the author leaves us to think upon the ending of Clarence :)

I hope you enjoyed my review, I would recommend this book to the age range its suited to or for anyone who wants to look into writing children fiction or anyone who wants to feel enchanted by being a bit of a kid again :)

Brave New World






This is my review, taken off of my Goodreads page (http://www.goodreads.com/BookNerd94) on Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, enjoy :)




Okay, so I have been wanting to read this book for around 2 and a half years, after delving into more modern classic dystopias.


(I don't know if that is right to say but I wanted to say not YA dystopia, as to me dystopia has been around so much longer and is slightly becoming tainted by the YA obsession - However saying that it won't stop me reading them and enjoying them) 


So when I finally picked up this book to read for uni, I was excited but also a bit apprehensive. Apprehensive you ask? Well when I had to slog through introductions and forewords about the book that I had yet to read, I become a bit nervous. Now don't get me wrong the introductions by Margaret Atwood and David Bradshaw were very good, BUT could they have not been put at the back of the book. I know I could of read the story first then the intros but I have a thing about chronological order. So skimming through these without knowing anything about the book put me on a rocky road of uneasiness. I will probably go back and read the intros now and be fine, It just felt s alien from me because I knew NOTHING and they were talking about things that did not make any sense AT THE TIME. 


Anyways, away from that slight drama...the book itself. As I said I was really looking forward to this but after a few pages I was very much 'huh?!?'.


So about 3 pages in, the disjointed listing overload of information had me doubting Huxley, the writing felt very fractured and I felt a barrier was brought up. I couldn't get into this world, yes it a very different alien one to our own society but I did not feel like I could take the book and plunge myself straight into it like I wanted to. The listing at first would of been okay if it did not go on for pages with no sign of a full stop anywhere and as a said a very disjointed narrative at first. However the details of the hatching centre were very intricate, yet I felt like Bam! Info Overload. 


(Now Please Before you think I am hating on a esteemed piece of work, check my rating and let me continue, because I will get into what was good :) )




Now chapter 3, I have something to say on...




I know Huxley was probably going for a choppy and quick narrative to create a certain atmosphere, but this chapter to me was HELL. There are four different scenes or voices occurring talking about different things. I became so confused and lost on who was talking that I felt the effectiveness of this narrative technique was diminished. I don't mind chopping and changing between say two scenes, but with clear distinction of the changes. I think Huxley was a bit overambitious with this part, there needed to be a bit more clear changes or scenes cut up a bit differently. Now the passage was interesting but very frustrating, I do however very much understand what Huxley was trying to present, to me it just did not work as well as it could of.

So now.... on to the good stuff!!!!

THIS WORLD! I love the way Huxley has created this Utopia world so different yet so close to our own! It's so imaginative and complex and intriguing. 

The social conditioning and the way the people in this world act are so peculiar but almost all seem happy. The control of the governing body is so astoundingly obvious to the reader but there is no doubt in the eyes of the people, except of course Bernard Marx. 

Now to me when Bernard and (I think) Lenina head over to the Savage reservation the book picked up. I really enjoyed the 'savage' aka John and when he came into the world that is so conditioned from birth. The idea of the outsider looking in and unable to participate in this world he has been told so much about by a mother who used to live there. I felt sorry for him in the end, the other guys were quite happy but his self destruction was painful to witness. 

I am trying here to really put everything I want to say in, but I finished this book a few days ago and have already read another so I hope this review can do this book justice. 

Two more things I really want to touch on is the sexual and motherhood aspect as well as the Directors words near the end. 

Now for our world the sexualness throughout this book is in some ways a stone throw away from our world. BUT its not, the weird conditioning that they undergo through birth creating the touchy feely and Orgy-Porgy, is very disturbing at the same time. Especially in the case of young children, which would in our society be very very taboo! Huxley explores taboo very well for the time he is writing for, as well as being relevant for today. He creates this almost god like character of the Ford that people worship like they would do a god in todays society, but it becomes so perverse and peculiar. Not to say that is a bad thing, I think Huxley's imagination and creativity in this world is outstanding. I like the way Huxley, made everything either quite subtle or the sexual tones where not very explicit unless read into. I know some parts this is not the case but I feel Huxley dealt with it rather well. 

Motherhood, is a foreign term for the people in this world, and I found it so hard to understand that, a bit like the savage John, being from the society we are from, the idea that these people are actually so incredibly alone yet together is so sad as well. As the book goes on, this perfect world becomes so un-perfect. People have no emotional ties to anyone, are constantly being drugged by Soma to stay completely happy and bliss (as not to cause any instability ) or to knock them out as to make them in a permanent state of blissful sleep for several days.

This society was founded as to stop wars and pain by eliminating anything that could cause instability. So although the idea of the society was right, they take out some aspects, such as emotional ties with relationships and motherhood, that make up humanity. The conservation between the Controller and the three men was very enlightening into the true nature of the world and you begin to not just despise this world but understand the creation of it. 

Overall this book made me tear my hair out at first but once I was in it I felt the wonder and beauty that is this world of Huxley's. I am giving it four stars purely based not just on the book, but the world created and the endings. And the ending is a shocker in some ways. 


I would recommend this to anyone who enjoys dystopias, who likes to see the ins and out of different world and politics.